One cybersecurity program across every entity in the network.
Valentra Labs runs the cybersecurity program for an integrated delivery network as one operating layer on Valentra Nexus — a single record of assets, risk, controls, and evidence spanning hospitals, clinics, and acquired groups — so a multi-entity system reports one defensible posture, not a different answer at every facility.
Every entity, one posture
An IDN inherits a different security posture at every entity it integrates — each hospital, physician group, and acquired clinic arrives with its own tools, its own gaps, and its own undocumented risk. Without a single operating record the same exposure is re-discovered facility by facility, and network leadership sees a federation it cannot measure as one.
Valentra Labs operates one program across the whole network. Valentra Nexus standardizes assets, risk, controls, and evidence on a single record, folds each integrated entity into it through a repeatable onboarding, and keeps care delivery continuous while it does — producing a board-ready Decision Packet that reports the network's risk as one posture instead of a stack of facility-level spreadsheets.
Measure the network against one baseline
The NIST CSF path walks a multi-entity network through how a single maturity baseline is set and operated across every facility, so integration raises the whole network rather than averaging it down. It is how the network measures itself as one.
One Decision Packet across the network
Across every entity it operates, the network produces a single board-ready Decision Packet — the situation, options, recommendation, evidence, and approval chain — that network leadership and the board read together. It is the same artifact every Valentra Labs program produces, generated by Valentra Nexus.
Decision Packet · v1.0
Q2 2026 — Crown-Jewel Risk Disposition
pkt_2026-04-17_a3f8e1·
Situation
Q2 program review covers the crown-jewel ePHI store and its supporting control envelope. 487 endpoints catalogued across three network segments; 12 unsanctioned SaaS surfaces detected by the shadow-IT scan. Continuous monitoring posture is operating; the residual question is risk acceptance for two compensating-control gaps surfaced this cycle.
Risk & Impact
14 critical findings scored against the revenue-at-risk model. Two compensating gaps (vendor-SOC-2 attestation lapse + patch-cycle #38 awaiting CAB sign-off) carry residual risk of $1.4M in unmitigated regulatory exposure if a HITRUST audit lands before remediation closes. Patient-data confidentiality remains the load-bearing impact dimension.
Options
Accept residual risk through Q3, with quarterly board re-review.
Accelerate remediation by re-prioritizing the patch cycle ahead of the planned Q3 platform migration (cost: 2 engineer-weeks).
Transfer risk via expanded cyber-insurance rider (cost: $48K/yr premium delta; coverage gap on ePHI exfiltration remains).
Recommendation
Pursue Option 2 — accelerate remediation. The 2 engineer-weeks of effort cost is recoverable in Q3; the residual exposure is asymmetric (regulatory floor of $1.4M vs. ~$120K labor delta). Document the patch-cycle re-prioritization as a logged decision with the program owner; close the SOC-2 attestation gap via vendor outreach in the same window. Insurance rider deferred to Q4 review.
Evidence
Twelve evidence artifacts back the recommendation — asset inventory, control mapping, vendor SOC-2 status, residual-risk model, patch-cycle telemetry, and the prior packet's audit trail. One control attestation is overridden with a documented compensating-control narrative; two vendor attestations are pending the Q2 refresh window.
Overridden per compensating-control narrative — see attached
Penetration test report — Q1 follow-up
#a5b6c7d8
stale
—
Prior packet audit trail — pkt_2026-01-09_b8c4e2
#b6c7d8e9
verified
—
Approval Chain
CIO and CISO have signed. The CCO signature is pending receipt of the vendor-SOC-2 refresh; the program owner has logged the override and the compensating-control narrative.
Chief Information OfficerM. AlvarezSigned 2026-04-17T14:08:11Z
Chief Information Security OfficerJ. ParkSigned 2026-04-17T14:18:42Z
The program maps each operating stage — asset, risk, control, evidence, work, decision — to the frameworks an integrated network reports against, so one control posture holds consistently across every facility. Valentra Nexus carries the full framework-alignment grid; see how the stages line up on the platform page.
Valentra Labs runs one cybersecurity program across an integrated delivery network on Valentra Nexus — one record of assets, risk, controls, and evidence spanning every hospital, clinic, and acquired group — so an IDN reports one defensible posture, not a different answer at each facility.